QUOTE(prodigious1 @ Aug 8 2009, 10:22 PM)

Monzon is the better, smarter, tougher fighter. Enough for me. He'd catch Moorer with punches that he never saw coming, during exchanges.
A 15lb weight advantage don't mean more than quality, style and the other intangibles that Monzon has in his favour.
Young Moorer is going to beat Carlos Mozon at the peak of his experience? That's tough to swallow.
It''s not about fighting AT 175. It's about fighting at a comfortable weight AGAINST a specific 175 lb man. That's what gets lost in these current fight deals and mythical match-ups.
Young Moorer had tools, but you're not going convince me that he had the maturity, mentality, grit or skills to beat Monzon. No.
Not sure I like this matchup for Monzon. He was not really a slick, in and out fighter. He'd catch some hard shots from Moorer. And while he had a great chin, I'm not sure he would have had the kind of power at 175 that he had at 160. As a MW, Monzon was usually the bigger man, against Moorer he'd be significantly smaller, and his feet weren't exactly the quickest in the world. I think Moorer would be doing most of the hitting early at least. The question is can Monzon absorb Moorer's punches well enough early and still mount an effective offense later. I have my doubts. Monzon was an all time great at 160 and could have been at 168 as well. At 175 I think he would have been less formidable.