QUOTE(c0rvette @ Aug 11 2009, 02:29 PM)

I dont know, Kessler just has never impressed me as much as he has alot of people. He stepped up once in competition and got his ass handed to him by Joe, I just dont see where this other great stuff he does comes from, hes fought no one and beat no one.
Calzaghe won 8 rounds at most. The fight could have been scored 7-5. It was far from a beating. Calzaghe clearly won, but as I understand Kessler was less than 100% for that fight.
Kessler's beaten some quality opponents at 168, including Manny Siacca, Librado Andrade, Anthony Mundine and Marcus Beyer. Are those guys as dangerous as McClellan? Bo. But I think Kessler's resume is at least as strong, if not stronger than McClellan's. Really, McClellan's only big wins were over Julian Jackson (the Mugabi win came after Hagler and Norris had worn him down). Julian Jackson was probably the weakest of the MW titleholders when McClellan fought him.
Just because Kessler lost to Calzaghe does not mean that McClellan would have had the same success. McClellan did have the same speed and awkward style of Calzaghe, nor did he have Calzaghe's workrate. He was more of a powerpunching sharp shooter.
If anything, the fact that McClellan lost to Benn when he did bodes well for Kessler. Kessler is a much more formidable fighter than Benn was at the time McClellan fought him. Benn was not a particularly huge puncher at 168. I'm sure Kessler hits as hard if not harder. Kessler appears to have a better beard, and he certainly is a better fighter from a technical perspective. I also think that Benn was starting to decline when he fought McClellan.
All of the comments you make about Kessler could probably be made with even greater force with respect to McClellan. Who was really more potential than actual accomplishment.