

Bradley-Marquez
#62
Posted 25 September 2013 - 09:13 PM
Jaxamillian, on 25 September 2013 - 07:21 PM, said:
Not from me, I've been calling you Pac massacres Marquez fools for two fights.
#63
Posted 25 September 2013 - 10:09 PM
YellowLorrySlow, on 25 September 2013 - 09:13 PM, said:
I never said Pac killed Marquez. I was right there with you disagreeing with people that said JMM 3 was a wipeout for Pac. It doesn't make you, or any boxing fan, impervious to the "last fight was an impressibe knockout" hype. I think Marquez is gonna have problems here if Tim fights smart.
Edited by Jaxamillian, 25 September 2013 - 10:09 PM.
#64
Posted 25 September 2013 - 11:12 PM
Jaxamillian, on 25 September 2013 - 10:09 PM, said:
That's definitely the biggest pile of shit I've read on here for quite some time.
#65
Posted 26 September 2013 - 06:24 AM
YellowLorrySlow, on 25 September 2013 - 05:05 PM, said:
With Vegas making JMM a favorite, it seems like a majority of the boxing world expects Bradley to be Pacquiaoed. What would really be a Marquez-Pacquiao IV style shocker is if Bradley were to put Marquez to sleep. I would never bet on that, I'm just saying that would be more in keeping with what happened in 2012 in terms of expectation.
Edited by Smelodies, 26 September 2013 - 06:42 AM.
#66
Posted 26 September 2013 - 11:27 AM
Smelodies, on 26 September 2013 - 06:24 AM, said:
Bizarre response.
#68
Posted 26 September 2013 - 06:33 PM
YellowLorrySlow, on 25 September 2013 - 11:12 PM, said:
Look at my post history.
Edit: I guess post history doesn't go back as far as JMM 3. I was saying it would be his hardest fight since JMM 2. I don't remember what I called for the 4th fight.
Edited by Jaxamillian, 26 September 2013 - 06:35 PM.
#69
Posted 27 September 2013 - 05:43 AM
Smelodies, on 26 September 2013 - 01:55 PM, said:
Unless JMM has completely gone over the cliff, I don't see that happening. I could see Bradley dropping Marquez at some point, either from a perfect punch or accumulation (the latter might be more likely, but still not something I'd put more than 50/50 odds on at best). But if JMM still has gas in the tank he won't be getting stopped.
I do expect Bradley to give JMM a rough go of it. JMM doesn't have the speed of Pacquiao to offset Bradley's attack. He's going to have to count on being able to hurt Bradley with precise counterpunches.
JMM has gotten older since the Diaz fight. But in the first Diaz fight, Juan was able to have success bulling and swarming Marquez. I think Bradley is a better and stronger version of Diaz.
Unless Bradley has become gunshy as a result of the Provodnikov fight (which I hope is not the case), I think this can be a really good, competitive scrap.
#71
Posted 27 September 2013 - 01:17 PM
#75
Posted 28 September 2013 - 10:08 PM
#78
Posted 30 September 2013 - 04:11 AM
Pugilistica Dementia, on 29 September 2013 - 09:20 PM, said:
Nacho sure didn't think so.
Article Link - http://www.boxingsce...7#ixzz2gNLrBULT
This is a legal waiver. By copying and using the material from this article, you agree to give full credit to BoxingScene.com or provide a link to the original article.
"I have never liked Bradley [as a possible opponent] and I don't know if I can be leveraged in any way to convince my top fighter [to face him]. We would search for an opponent who would [be exciting], and give the people of Mexico everything that they deserve. A fight with Timothy Bradley would be a stinking fight and I wouldn't like to see my top pugilist in that type of fight, and present something like that to the people who have supported Juan Manuel since he was a six round fighter," Nacho said.
#80
Posted 30 September 2013 - 09:28 AM
Smelodies, on 30 September 2013 - 04:11 AM, said:
Article Link - http://www.boxingsce...7#ixzz2gNLrBULT
This is a legal waiver. By copying and using the material from this article, you agree to give full credit to BoxingScene.com or provide a link to the original article.
"I have never liked Bradley [as a possible opponent] and I don't know if I can be leveraged in any way to convince my top fighter [to face him]. We would search for an opponent who would [be exciting], and give the people of Mexico everything that they deserve. A fight with Timothy Bradley would be a stinking fight and I wouldn't like to see my top pugilist in that type of fight, and present something like that to the people who have supported Juan Manuel since he was a six round fighter," Nacho said.
Sounds like he's worried about it being boring, not about Bradley winning. What he was really doing was trying to drive up the paycheck.
#82
Posted 01 October 2013 - 02:49 PM
RAWDOGG69STYLE, on 30 September 2013 - 10:25 PM, said:
How do you like Canelo but not JMM?
#84
Posted 03 October 2013 - 12:50 AM
Jaxamillian, on 01 October 2013 - 02:49 PM, said:
How do you like Canelo but not JMM?
Jmm is a legend who ever said i didnt like him...Canelos a prodigy...floyds a grand master...there all proven...i like em all i just admire Bradleys willingness to say fuk it im probably supposed to lose but in my mind body n spirit i refuse to lose so lets rock...im a boxing fan i admire different things about different fighters...certain guys i dont like because they have lookt shitty against B level opposition but swear their A level like Erislandy Lara...show me then i will give u props like rigendoux did against donaire or canelo over trout...bradleys proven time and time again he can face adversity or tha odds and prevail...i dont like that jmm was on tha juice vs pac but hey pac started it and jmm just finished it.
#86
Posted 03 October 2013 - 06:15 AM
msp1518, on 03 October 2013 - 06:06 AM, said:
People keep asking how Bradley's chin will hold up if he gets hit with the shots that Provodnikov landed on him. But I have my doubts whether Marquez's chin is as good as Provodnikov's, especially at welterweight. Won't be surprised at all if Juan Manuel visits the canvas a time or two (as usual).
Edited by Smelodies, 03 October 2013 - 06:16 AM.
#87
Posted 03 October 2013 - 06:39 AM
#88
Posted 03 October 2013 - 12:24 PM
Thank God Bradley is not a puncher. That is why I believe Marquez will go the distance. But I don't see him winning this fight as long as Bradley doesn't get stupid the way Pacquiao did in fight IV.
#89
Posted 03 October 2013 - 01:50 PM
msp1518, on 03 October 2013 - 12:24 PM, said:
Thank God Bradley is not a puncher. That is why I believe Marquez will go the distance. But I don't see him winning this fight as long as Bradley doesn't get stupid the way Pacquiao did in fight IV.
I don't think the Baby Bull put Marquez on the canvas. The most he did was send him reeling into the ropes early on in their first encounter but if memory serves me correctly, 'twas not counted as an official knockdown.
Marquez' recovery skills are second-to-none, but I don't think he's going to be calling on them for this fight. At this stage in his carreer and considering the style of his opponent, I'd bet Marquez is focusing on endurance/stamina/conditioning and things of this nature. He's already got the skill set to match Bradley. He just has to make sure he can hang with him for 36 minutes.
#90
Posted 03 October 2013 - 02:24 PM
Muziko1, on 03 October 2013 - 01:50 PM, said:
Marquez' recovery skills are second-to-none, but I don't think he's going to be calling on them for this fight. At this stage in his carreer and considering the style of his opponent, I'd bet Marquez is focusing on endurance/stamina/conditioning and things of this nature. He's already got the skill set to match Bradley. He just has to make sure he can hang with him for 36 minutes.
And Barrera wasn't nearly shot when JMM put one on him. You're right about Diaz. Marquez can get his shit together like no other. I also have a feeling this one could be a barn burner. I'm hoping the all out war between Bradley and Provodnikov hasn't made Bradley gun shy. I don't think it would, dude brings his ass on the regular. I think Bradley knows he needs to make Marquez work. That's going to mean lots of exchanges. Fo shizzl and such.
Reply to this topic

0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users